Market Insight - Hiring Practice
Your Job Title Isn't Telling Candidates What the Job Actually Is
Titles like 'project engineer,' 'controls engineer,' and 'field engineer' now stretch across such different scopes of work that the title alone screens out the wrong candidates.
· 6 min · Market Insights
The same title, three different jobs
Post a 'controls engineer' role at a semiconductor fab, a water treatment plant, and a food manufacturing line, and you'll get three fundamentally different jobs under the same two words. One is deep in a single high-end PLC/SCADA platform integrated with an MES. Another is largely instrumentation and loop tuning. The third involves as much regulatory documentation as it does programming. Candidates scanning titles have no way to tell which one they're looking at, and many self-select out based on assumptions that turn out to be wrong.
The same pattern shows up with 'project engineer,' which can mean anything from a junior coordination role shepherding paperwork to a senior technical lead making design decisions, and 'field engineer,' which spans everything from a rotational commissioning specialist to a largely desk-based liaison role that occasionally visits site.
Why this matters more now than it used to
- Candidates increasingly research a role heavily before applying, so a vague title filters people out before they ever open the job description
- The tight labor markets described elsewhere in this reporting mean fewer qualified people are casually browsing broad title searches - they're targeting specific scope
- Recruiters and internal talent teams waste real time screening candidates who assumed a scope the job doesn't actually have, and vice versa
- Compensation benchmarking gets distorted when wildly different scopes are compared under the same title across companies
| Title | Version A | Version B |
|---|---|---|
| Controls Engineer | PLC/SCADA programming, MES integration, greenfield startup | Loop tuning, instrumentation calibration, brownfield maintenance |
| Project Engineer | Junior coordination, submittals, RFIs | Senior technical lead, design decisions, vendor management |
| Field Engineer | Rotational commissioning, travel-heavy | Site liaison, largely local, occasional travel |
What to do about it in a job posting
The fix isn't inventing new titles - candidates still search on standard terms, so abandoning 'controls engineer' for something creative usually just hurts discoverability. The fix is loading the first two sentences of the posting with the specifics a title can't carry: the platform, the phase of work, the travel expectation, and the level of autonomy.
A practical checklist for scoping a posting
- Name the specific platform, system, or equipment the role touches, not just the discipline
- State the project phase - design, startup/commissioning, or steady-state operations - since the actual day-to-day differs enormously by phase
- Be explicit about travel and rotation expectations in the first few lines, not buried near the bottom
- Describe the level of autonomy expected (executing a defined scope versus making independent design or sequencing decisions)
Summary
Key takeaways
- Standard engineering titles like 'controls engineer' or 'project engineer' now cover such varied scope that candidates can't tell what the job actually is from the title alone
- Vague titles cause qualified candidates to self-select out and cause mismatched candidates to apply, wasting screening time on both sides
- The fix is specificity in the opening lines of the posting - platform, project phase, travel, and autonomy - not inventing new job titles
- Compensation benchmarking is also distorted when different scopes are compared under the same generic title
Answers
Frequently asked questions
Question not covered here? Ask a recruiter directly - you will get a straight technical answer, not a callback from a salesperson.
Keep going
Read next
- The Interview Guide for Controls and Automation EngineersMost controls and automation interviews reward candidates who can talk fluently about a platform, not candidates who can actually troubleshoot one under pressure. This guide gives hiring managers a structured scorecard and question set that tests for the second thing.
- Travel-Heavy Roles and the Shrinking Pool Willing to RotateField and commissioning roles that require heavy travel or extended rotations are drawing from a shrinking pool of engineers willing to accept that lifestyle, and pay premiums alone are no longer closing the gap the way they once did.
- Reshored Manufacturing's Automation Talent ProblemReshoring announcements have added plant capacity across semiconductors, batteries, and general manufacturing, but the PLC, SCADA, and automation engineering workforce needed to commission and run those lines is smaller than the announcements assume.
Need this applied to your own requisition?
Our recruiters will run the same analysis against your scope and send back a written market view for the disciplines you are planning.
